Alex McFarland: The Originial Christmas Story on Which All Other Christmas Stories Are Based On

Growing up in Greensboro, North Carolina, my grade school education included learning about one of the town’s more famous past residents William Sydney Porter. Does this name ring a bell? Perhaps you’ve heard of his pseudonym, “O’ Henry.” Porter (1862-1910) left employment in his family’s local drug store to establish himself as a writer. He is remembered for crafting one of America’s best-loved short stories The Gift of the Magi.

The plotline of O’Henry’s Christmas story has captivated readers around the globe: a young couple, deeply in love but financially poor, sacrifices greatly in order to give gifts to each other. The husband sells an heirloom pocket watch in order to buy his wife a set of combs and pins for her hair (a century ago such things were made of tortoise shell, pearl, or ivory, and were very expensive). The wife—whose lovely hair was her pride and joy—sells it in order to buy the husband a gold chain for his beloved watch.

Though selfless love is certainly demonstrated in their actions, as a child this Catch-22 story frustrated me. It took a few years of reading before I understood that the author was renowned for such surprise endings. It would be even longer before I understood the ultimate act of sacrificial love on which O’Henry’s story was based.

The Old Testament book of Isaiah points to the coming Savior in a number of key passages. Isaiah famously speaks of the one who would someday be, “led like a Lamb to slaughter” (53:7), and “by Whose stripes we are healed (Is. 53:5; I Peter 2:24). Writing around 750 BC, Isaiah amazingly portrays scenes from the Savior’s time on earth that we would later read about in the Gospels: He would be born of a virgin (c.f., Isaiah 7:14 and Lk. 1:34). The Messiah would be God incarnate (c.f. Is. 9:6 and Mark 14:61-61, and John 10:30-33). He would be beaten beyond recognition, even before being put to death on the Cross (c.f. Is. 52:14 and Matthew 27:26-31).

Here is where the facts about Christmas might seem to be as hard to reconcile as the ending of an O’Henry tale: clearly, the Father loves and cherishes His unique and only Son, Jesus. So much so that when Christ was suffering for the sins of the world and dying on the Cross, the Father looked away. Though no one fully understands how, for the first and only time in all of eternity the Father and the Son were separated. As Christ’s horrific betrayal, woundings, and death culminated, it is a wonder that the wrath of God didn’t erupt onto the entire globe!

The irony is that Isaiah 53:10 says, “It pleased the Father to bruise Him” (literally, “to crush Him”). How can this be? How could God possibly have been pleased with the vicious execution of the One called “His beloved Son”? How could the hateful and brutal treatment of Jesus have been pleasing to the Father?

Click here to read more.

SOURCE: Christian Post, Alex McFarland