Conservatives Laud Trump’s Plan to End Obama’s Transgender Policies and Ideology

U.S. President Barack Obama (R) meets with President-elect Donald Trump to discuss transition plans in the White House Oval Office in Washington, U.S., November 10, 2016. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Conservatives believing that sex is biologically determined at birth are ecstatic about President Donald Trump’s proposal to roll back the transgender ideology established by former President Barack Obama.

The biggest liberal daily in the Big Apple announced the Trump administration is considering the roll-back to end the gender confusion – one that escalated under pro-LGBT Obama’s watch.

“The Trump administration is considering narrowly defining gender as a biological, immutable condition determined by genitalia at birth – the most drastic move yet in a governmentwide effort to roll back recognition and protections of transgender people under federal civil rights law,” The New York Times reported. “A series of decisions by the Obama administration loosened the legal concept of gender in federal programs – including in education and health care, recognizing gender largely as an individual’s choice and not determined by the sex assigned at birth.”

Driving back Obama’s abomination …

Because many of the pro-LGBT privileges put America’s youth in physical – and emotional – danger, many Americans vehemently opposed Obama’s radical new policies catering to the left.

“The policy prompted fights over bathrooms, dormitories, single-sex programs and other arenas where gender was once seen as a simple concept,” the Times’ Erica L. Green, Katie Benner and Robert Pear recalled. “Conservatives – especially evangelical Christians – were incensed.”

Obama’s LGBT privileges have been seen as particularly endangering vulnerable women and children – exposing them to potentially being exploited by sexual predators in areas where they are most susceptible to abuse.

“But the transgender ideology demands that the federal government enforce rules which help people easily switch their legal sex – regardless of biology,” Breitbart News reported. “This ideology would eliminate many single-sex institutions, including sports leagues, showers and bathrooms.”

The New York daily obtained a memo from Trump’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which is spearheading the attempt to establish a legal definition of sex under Title IX – a federal civil rights law that prohibits government-funded education programs from discriminating by gender.

“[Key government agencies must adopt an explicit and uniform definition of gender that is determined] on a biological basis that is clear, grounded in science, objective and administrable,” the Trump HHS document reads.

Instead of leaving it up to a person’s whim as to whether one wants to identify as male, female – or something else – HHS is moving to establish a no-nonsense, practical solution that has worked fine for societies over the millennia.

“The agency’s proposed definition would define sex as either male or female, unchangeable, and determined by the genitals that a person is born with, according to a draft reviewed by the Times,” Green, Benner and Pear noted. “Any dispute about one’s sex would have to be clarified using genetic testing.”

The proposed change back to practicality was drafted last spring and has been circulating ever since.

“Sex means a person’s status as male or female based on immutable biological traits identifiable by or before birth,” the memo states. “The sex listed on a person’s birth certificate, as originally issued, shall constitute definitive proof of a person’s sex – unless rebutted by reliable genetic evidence.”

Less than half a percent of Americans would have their new LGBT-friendly gender status revoked if the administration’s new definition of gender is adopted over Obama’s.

“The new definition would essentially eradicate federal recognition of the estimated 1.4 million Americans who have opted to recognize themselves – surgically or otherwise – as a gender other than the one they were born into,” the Times noted.

Click here to read more.

SOURCE: One News Now, Michael F. Haverluck