Michael Avenatti, the attorney for Stormy Daniels, has made shocking claims that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and other men would ply women with alcohol or drugs at house parties and then allow men to ‘gang rape’ them.
In an email to Mike Davis, the Chief Counsel for Nominations, Avenatti says he has ‘significant evidence’ of house parties in Washington D.C. during the early 1980s ‘during which Kavanaugh, Mark Judge and others would participate in the targeting of women’.
He said they would use ‘alcohol’ or ‘drugs’ to allow a ‘train’ of men to subsequently gang rape them.
Avenatti claims there are ‘multiple witnesses that will corroborate these facts and each of them must be called to testify publicly’.
In a tweet with a screenshot of the email, he wrote: ‘We demand that this process be thorough, open and fair, which is what the American public deserves. It must not be rushed and evidence/witnesses must not be hidden.’
Neither Kavanaugh or Judge have responded to Avenatti’s latest allegations.
Earlier in the evening, the lawyer tweeted: ‘I represent a woman with credible information regarding Judge Kavanaugh and Mark Judge.’
‘We will be demanding the opportunity to present testimony to the committee and will likewise be demanding that Judge and others be subpoenaed to testify.
‘The nomination must be withdrawn.’
The claims in the email appeared to draw parallels to a piece published earlier on Sunday evening in the New Yorker with new allegations against Kavanaugh.
The article by Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayor contained a second sexual misconduct allegation against Kavanaugh by Yale classmate Deborah Ramirez.
She claims that Kavanaugh exposed himself to her and ‘made her touch his penis without consent’ at a Yale dorm party 35 years ago. Avenatti said Ramirez is not his client.
Kavanaugh strongly denies Ramirez’s claims. He released a statement on Sunday night saying: ‘This alleged event from 35 years ago did not happen. The people who knew me then know that this did not happen, and have said so. This is a smear, plain and simple.
‘I look forward to testifying on Thursday about the truth, and defending my good name–and the reputation for character and integrity I have spent a lifetime building–against these last-minute allegations.’
In the article, Elizabeth Rasor told the New Yorker that she dated Judge for three years after meeting at Catholic University and felt ‘morally obligated’ to challenge his account that ‘no horseplay’ took place at Georgetown Prep with women.
‘I cannot stand by and watch him lie’, he said. ‘Mark told me a very different story’.
She claims that Judge described an incident that involved him and other boys taking turns having sex with a drunk woman, and Judge seemed to ‘regard it as fully consensual’.
Rasor told the New Yorker that Judge did not name other people involved, meaning she had no knowledge the Kavanaugh participated in what Judge described.
The White House also backed their candidate in a statement on Sunday that read: ‘This 35-year-old, uncorroborated claim is the latest in a coordinated smear campaign by the Democrats designed to tear down a good man.
‘This claim is denied by all who were said to be present and is wholly inconsistent with what many women and men who knew Judge Kavanaugh at the time in college say. The White House stands firmly behind Judge Kavanaugh.’
After Ramirez’s allegations were published, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Dianne Feinstein, sought the ‘immediate postponement’ of any further action in the nomination process.
Judge is the man who went to high school with Kavanaugh.
He is alleged to have witnessed Kavanaugh sexually assault Christine Blasey Ford, a professor from California.
Ford’s allegations are threatening to derail Kavanaugh’s nomination to the highest court in the land.
Click here to read more.
Source: Daily Mail