One of the legacies of President Donald Trump may be making President Barack Obama seem like a moderate by comparison. But let’s not kid ourselves.
In a Friday speech, Obama decried the lack of bipartisanship, checks and balances, empathy and comity in politics today, seemingly oblivious to the irony of his words.
Much of Obama’s analysis of the Trump administration and the current state of the Republican Party was on target, but also hypocritical given the source.
Today’s divisive politics, Obama told University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign students, is partly “manufactured by the powerful and the privileged who want to keep us divided and keep us angry and keep us cynical because that helps them maintain the status quo and keep their power and keep their privilege. … It did not start with Donald Trump. He is a symptom, not the cause. He’s just capitalizing on resentments that politicians have been fanning for years.”
Increasing divisiveness, Obama continued, “made it harder to build consensus on issues. It made politicians less willing to compromise, which increased gridlock, which made people even more cynical about politics.”
Exactly. And he was one of those politicians.
Obama was not bipartisan. In 2010, he appointed a bipartisan commission to come up with recommendations to tackle the crisis of our national debt and growth of entitlements, then ignored its recommendations. Congressional Republican leaders came close to a similar bipartisan “grand bargain” compromise in the summer of 2011, then Obama killed the deal.
While a U.S. senator, Obama voted against a compromise immigration bill because it didn’t have everything he wanted. When he became president and his party had a filibuster-proof majority in Congress, he did nothing on immigration. After his party lost control of Congress, he blamed Republicans for not passing immigration reform.
Is it any wonder people are more cynical about politics?
“Appealing to tribe, appealing to fear, pitting one group against another, telling people that order and security will be restored if it weren’t for those who don’t look like us or don’t sound like us or don’t pray like we do, that’s an old playbook,” Obama said.
Yes. Obama used the same playbook, preferring to use issues like immigration, gun violence and racism to stoke fear and rile his base, rather than seek bipartisan solutions.
Regarding Trump’s “cozying up to Russia,” Obama said, “In a healthy democracy, there’s some checks and balances on this kind of behavior, this kind of inconsistency, but right now there’s none.”
Correct. And checks and balances were often disregarded by Obama.
After Congress, the body closest to the will of the people, debated and rejected legislation for unauthorized immigrants who arrived as children, Obama implemented the basics of the bill anyway via executive order, which federal judges declared illegal. Obama’s use of executive orders was even mocked by NBC’s comedy show “Saturday Night Live.”
In March, 2012, Obama was caught on a hot mic telling the president of Russia that after he wins re-election he would have “more flexibility” to give Russia what it wants. In Obama’s second term, Russia used that flexibility to invade Ukraine. Obama did nothing. “Cozying up to Russia”? He would know.
“It should not be a partisan issue to say that we do not pressure the attorney general or the FBI to use the criminal justice system as a cudgel to punish our political opponents,” Obama said.
“I complained plenty about Fox News — but you never heard me threaten to shut them down, or call them enemies of the people,” he said.
Good. However, the Obama Justice Department did target journalists using the Espionage Act more than all previous presidents combined, claimed Fox News reporter James Rosen was a “criminal co-conspirator” and prosecuted New York Times reporter James Risen for refusing to name their sources, seized the phone records of The Associated Press, and Attorney General Eric Holder committed perjury in testimony to Congress about these actions.
Obama also angrily harangued reporters in off-the-record profanity-laced tirades for reporting on White House scandals.
Jill Abramson, the executive editor of The New York Times at the time, who had covered every president since Reagan, said the Obama White House was the most secretive she had ever seen. Expressing her concerns about Obama, she said, “the process of news gathering is being criminalized.”
“It shouldn’t be Democratic or Republican to say we don’t target certain groups of people based on what they look like or how they pray,” Obama continued.
Click here to read more.
Source: Christian Post