U.S.’s Exit from Paris Climate Accord Sparks Renewed Debate Between Evangelical Organizations on Opposing Sides of the Climate Debate

President Trump’s exit from the Paris climate accord sparks renewed debate between two evangelical organizations on opposing sides of the climate debate.
Screen capture from WhiteHouse.gov

President Donald Trump has announced he will pull the United States out of the Paris climate accord, making good on one of his campaign promises.

In the evangelical community, the June 1 announcement sparked renewed debate between two evangelical organizations on opposing sides of the climate debate — the Cornwall Alliance and the Evangelical Environmental Alliance.

Trump described the 195-country agreement from December 2015 as a job killer that’s unfair to American taxpayers. “So we’re getting out — but we will start to negotiate, and we will see if we can make a deal that’s fair,” Trump said.

All but two countries — Syria and Nicaragua — signed on to the accord and President Barack Obama touted it as a key diplomatic victory for his administration.

Trump said he cares about protecting the environment but insisted the Paris accord is “less about the climate and more about other countries gaining a financial advantage over the United States.”

Cornwall Alliance founder and national spokesman E. Calvin Beisner affirmed Trump’s exit from the accord, which he said took courage in the face of pressure from many world leaders. An outcry of numerous political and environmental leaders and street protests followed the president’s announcement.

“Not only Americans but people all over the world should celebrate,” Beisner said, calling it “the right decision” in a news release posted at the website of the evangelical organization that has been a regular critic of climate change claims.

“It’s right because, as former NASA scientist and leading climate alarmist Dr. James Hansen put it, the Paris agreement is ‘a fraud, really, a fake … just worthless words,'” Beisner said.

The Cornwall Alliance news release expanded on Hansen’s words, noting, “… even assuming climate alarmists are right and human emissions of carbon dioxide are driving dangerous global warming, full implementation of the Paris agreement throughout this century would be of no help to the environment or to people. Instead, it would be harmful to both.

“And as President Trump said today, the Paris agreement is predicted by its proponents to ‘reduce global temperature by no more than 2 tenths of a degree Celsius.’ That reduction would cost $23 to $46 trillion per tenth of a degree Fahrenheit — an amount that will have no effect on the environment or human wellbeing.”

“It would trap billions in poverty for decades to come,” Beisner said in the news release.

Click here to read more.

SOURCE: Baptist Press
WORLD News Service & BP Staff