NAACP President, Cornell William Brooks, on the Unheard Voices and Invisible Faces Of Voter Suppression

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 15:  NAACP President and CEO Cornell William Brooks speaks during a press conference at the Lincoln Memorial June 15, 2015 in Washington, DC. Brooks announced "America's Journey for Justice," an 860-mile march from Selma, Alabama to Washington, D.C. and a campaign "to protect the right of every American to a fair criminal justice system, uncorrupted and unfettered access to the ballot box, sustainable jobs with a living wage, and equitable public education."  (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC – JUNE 15: NAACP President and CEO Cornell William Brooks speaks during a press conference at the Lincoln Memorial June 15, 2015 in Washington, DC. Brooks announced “America’s Journey for Justice,” an 860-mile march from Selma, Alabama to Washington, D.C. and a campaign “to protect the right of every American to a fair criminal justice system, uncorrupted and unfettered access to the ballot box, sustainable jobs with a living wage, and equitable public education.” (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Most Mondays, come the close of business, I head home to my wife and two teenage sons. But two weeks ago at 5pm, I was sitting in the Roanoke, Virginia police precinct, waiting to be fingerprinted, photographed, and charged. My misdemeanor? Trespassing, in formality; civil disobedience, in practice. My cause? The voting rights of people of color and youth.

August 6 marked the fifty-first anniversary of the Voting Rights Act. We observed solemnly this year, though, on account of the three-year-old legal milestone, Shelby County v. Holder. This 2013 Supreme Court decision disastrously undermined the Voting Rights Act’s protections against racial discrimination and opened up a floodgate of voter suppression. Suddenly, 1965 did not seem so distant, and we were hurled back to a time when Jim Crow reigned. State after state began creatively enacting voting restrictions that surreptitiously disenfranchised people of color and, even more covertly, youth. Now, instead of celebrating a half-century of equitable enfranchisement, we are about to face the harshest consequences of its absence. We are just over two months away from the first presidential election in fifty years without the full protection of the Voting Rights Act.

And so, in an ode to our civil rights forbearers, Stephen Green, national director of the NAACP’s Youth & College Division, and I joined forces with the Roanoke NAACP and Youth Council to hold a sit-in in the office of Representative Bob Goodlatte. Goodlatte chairs the House Judiciary Committee, which has refused to hold hearings on legislation to combat egregiously discriminatory voting laws enacted post-Shelby. Throughout our six-hour, nonviolent demonstration, the thirty of us – young and old together – called upon Representative Goodlatte to end his three-year pattern of inaction and commit to restoring the Voting Rights Act. Yet, despite our persistent presence, Goodlatte did not concede; Instead, he produced a recycled statement that called the Voting Rights Act “alive and well” as a tool for eradicating any state’s discriminatory voting laws. This sort of denial is utterly insulting and wholly insufficient. Our predecessors bled, sweat, and died for the right to vote; We pay respect to their bravery by continuing the tradition of civil disobedience, and we demand that our elected officials honor their sacrifice by restoring the Voting Rights Act.

Representative Goodlatte said that he would lend his support if discrimination could be shown. Thanks to the urging and advocacy of the NAACP, six courts and six states have revealed such discrimination. In the Congressman’s home state of Virginia, the U.S. Court Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled that North Carolina lawmakers had enacted voting laws with “racially discriminatory intent.” Here, sir, is your evidence. The Voting Rights Act is infirm and impaired, not “alive and well.”

We mourn the blows to the efficacy of the Voting Rights Act in the wake of Shelby County v. Holder, but today’s story of voter suppression is not the black versus white tale of 1965. Our electorate grows increasingly multi-ethnic and multi-generational every year, and African Americans are not the only ones who have been intentionally disenfranchised. There is a set of victims that our forbearers might not have imagined: youth. Young people are the bruised but invisible faces of today’s voter suppression.

We know the power of the millennial vote because we saw it in action in the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections. Young voters’ voices were booming until Shelby v. Holder restrictions systematically silenced them. In North Carolina, the changes were immediate: within weeks of the Supreme Court decision, state lawmakers set to work disenfranchising young voters by shutting down early voting sites on college campuses. Students at Appalachian State University in Watauga County took their case to court and won back their right to an accessible polling place, but other students studying in similarly conservative counties, such as those at the historically black Winston-Salem State University in Forsyth County, have not been so lucky. Increasingly, in states across the nation, polling places are moved off college campuses with a moment’s notice, school IDs are no longer honored at the ballot box, and DMVs are conveniently closed just when high school seniors are out of school.

Click here to read more

Source: Black Voices | Cornell William Brooks