DOJ Files Civil Rights Lawsuit Against Ferguson to Force Compliance With Policing Reform

doj-ferguson-civil-rights-lawsuit-lynch

The U.S. Justice Department is suing Ferguson, Missouri, alleging a pattern and practice of unconstitutional police conduct in the city.

“We intend to aggressively prosecute this case,” Attorney General Loretta Lynch told reporters Wednesday, “and we intend to prevail.”

Authorities had no choice but to file a lawsuit after the Ferguson City Council voted Tuesday to change the terms of a deal negotiators had been hashing out for months, Lynch said.

“The residents of Ferguson have suffered the deprivation of their constitutional rights, the rights guaranteed to all Americans, for decades. They have waited decades for justice,” Lynch said. “They should not be forced to wait any longer.”

A city spokesman told CNN that officials will have no comment about the Justice Department’s lawsuit until Thursday.

Ferguson officials have not seen the lawsuit, city spokesman Jeff Small said.

Negotiations over reforms to the city’s police force and municipal court system began after a Justice Department investigation last year found the Ferguson Police Department had demonstrated a “pattern and practice” of discrimination against African-Americans, targeting them disproportionately for traffic stops, use of force and jail sentences.

City Council proposed seven amendments

In a unanimous vote Tuesday night, council members approved the deal — but only if the Justice Department accepts seven amendments.

The Justice Department wasn’t expecting any changes to the negotiated deal and wasted little time in responding.

“The Ferguson City Council has attempted to unilaterally amend the negotiated agreement,” Vanita Gupta, head of the agency’s Civil Rights Division, said in a statement. “Their vote to do so creates an unnecessary delay in the essential work to bring constitutional policing to the city, and marks an unfortunate outcome for concerned community members and Ferguson police officers.”

The national spotlight on Ferguson began after the fatal shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown by Officer Darren Wilson in August 2014. Brown, who was unarmed, was black, and Wilson is white. Brown’s death prompted days of protests and riots in Ferguson and a national conversation about the role of race in police interactions with citizens.

Reaction to the City Council vote was mixed, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported.

One activist, Debra Kennedy, called the public hearings “a farce, because the DOJ is not going to go back and renegotiate,” the newspaper reported. “It was like a ‘no’ vote.”

Others chanted, “You can’t amend justice,” according to the Post-Dispatch.

Seven months of negotiation

The agreement that City Council wants to change was negotiated over seven months between the city and the Justice Department.

“Although we did not get everything we wanted in the agreement, we certainly made sure that what was agreed upon can be implemented in a timely and sufficient manner,” Ferguson Mayor James Knowles III said of the consent decree the city received January 26.

“We’re not trying to take away any safeguards,” Knowles told CNN affiliate KMOV. “We’re not trying to take away anything substantive out of the decree.”

City Councilwoman Ella James agreed.

“There are some things in the consent decree that we’re asking to be amended, but all in all I think we’re moving forward, we’re moving in a positive direction,” she told CNN affiliate KTVI.

What City Council wants

The original agreement would require the city to hire additional senior staff dedicated to the implementation of the deal and in areas such as crisis intervention and community-police relations. Other costs to the city of Ferguson would include the creation of an electronic complaint tracking system, an early intervention system and training throughout various levels of the police department.

Click here to continue reading.

SOURCE: CNN – Catherine E. Shoichet, Ed Payne and Steve Almasy