Think reaching a human at the Internal Revenue Service last tax filing season was tough? National Taxpayer Advocate Nina Olson anticipates even less telephone and face-to-face customer service in future years.
A planned expansion of IRS online offerings will leave taxpayers who seek help the old-fashioned way “up a creek,” Olson says, listing it as the No. 1 problem in a report to Congress released Wednesday.
The analysis by the Taxpayer Advocate Service, an independent office within the IRS, must include at least 20 of the “most serious problems” taxpayers face when dealing with the agency. The main focus this year: what it says is an emphasis on enforcement over customer service in the IRS’s long-term strategic plan, and how it could force many to pay tax preparers for advice they used to get for free.
Olson’s warning comes as Congress, after an abysmal 2015 tax season, gave the cash-starved agency an additional $290 million at the end of the budgeting process. The money is “targeted solely for taxpayer services to ensure the agency responds to taxpayer questions in a timely manner, and to improve fraud detection and prevention and cybersecurity,” according to a summary of the bill from the House Appropriations Committee.
Responding to the Taxpayer Advocate’s report, the IRS says it “does not paint a full picture” of evolving, long-term planning. “The Advocate seems to want the IRS to do business the way we did 10 years ago,” the agency wrote in a statement to Bloomberg. The IRS “believes increasing the availability of self-service interaction frees up in-person resources for taxpayers who truly need them.”
Here are some of the other major problems the Taxpayer Advocate identified in its report:
Lack of transparency
Since 2014 the IRS has spent “several million dollars” working with management consultants to develop a plan for how it will operate over the next five years. The details in the report haven’t been made public or shared with Congress, and the IRS hasn’t solicited comments from a broad pool of constituents, the advocate’s report notes.
Additionally, the IRS has never asserted so many times that data and documents the Taxpayer Advocate planned to include were for “official use only” and couldn’t be made public. That made this year’s report difficult to write, Olson says, “because while the intent to reduce telephone and face-to-face service has been a central assumption in the five-year ‘Future State’ planning process, little about service reductions has been committed to writing.”
Click here to read more.
SOURCE: Bloomberg, Suzanne Woolley