“I’m editing a Bible,” I’d answer when friends asked me about my freelance work. With a wink I’d add, “I’m taking out all the parts I don’t like.”
I’m embarrassed to admit that I probably repeated my corny quip way too many times during various stints when I served as the general editor for new Bibles. Of course I wasn’t editing the actual biblical text; I was working with commentators and devotional writers to create supplemental content.
But if I were asked to edit the Bible, it probably wouldn’t be too hard to think of texts it may be tempting to remove. Tricky passages about gender roles would make easy targets, along with lengthy genealogical lists and Levitical regulations about sanitation. Passages like these may seem difficult to understand, irrelevant, or a bit boring.
But—to be frank—there are parts of Scripture that are even harder to grapple with. What are we to do with ugly R-rated events like the murder of Uriah, the rape of Dinah, or the incest between Lot and his daughters? Or even uglier accounts like the slaughter of babies, God’s destruction of entire cities or most of earth’s population through a flood, or the wars God directed and plagues God sent that killed thousands of people?
If I wanted to put together a nice, positive, and encouraging Bible, I wouldn’t include any of that.
But—thanks be to God!—the Lord hasn’t given us simply a “nice, positive, encouraging” Bible. His Word isn’t the sanitized, straightforward text humankind may wish it was. He isn’t an anthropomorphic deity of our own making after all, and his Word isn’t a cut-and-paste text we can play with to fuel our comfort or supply us with feel-good slogans.
In our cover story, “3 Lies We Believe About the Bible,” Joy-Elizabeth Lawrence examines this tendency of ours to morph Scripture into slogans. She unpacks commonly misunderstood Bible passages that aren’t just misquoted by the culture at large but have also become clichés permeating the church.