Should Church Denominations Apologize for the Racial Sins of Their Fathers?

Image: Bryan Pollard / Shutterstock
Image: Bryan Pollard / Shutterstock`

The Presbyterian Church in America debates the sins of its fathers.

Instead of apologizing imperfectly for racism this year, the second-largest Presbyterian denomination in America will wait to repent more perfectly.

The Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) voted 684–46 during this year’s general assembly to defer action on a resolution that apologizes for “involvement in and complicity with racial injustice” during the civil rights era.

Supporters called the resolution an essential step toward reconciliation in a time of growing diversity; the 350,000-member denomination is now only 80 percent white. But some pastors questioned the need, since the PCA didn’t exist until nine years after the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Reformed Theological Seminary chancellor Ligon Duncan III, who introduced the resolution alongside church historian Sean M. Lucas, said it grew out of his friendship with African American pastors.

“When you become friends with a person who has experienced oppression, and you begin to love that person,” said Duncan, “you begin to care about the things that have hurt their heart.”

While the PCA didn’t exist during the civil rights era, many of its churches did, said Alex Shipman, a leader of the denomination’s newly formed African American Presbyterian Fellowship. Some of those churches barred blacks from membership, or stood silently by as Southerners fought to maintain Jim Crow segregation, he said.

“I’ve heard folks say that because that was not their sin, they didn’t want to deal with it,” he said. “But we believe in covenant theology. There are examples in the Old Testament that we confess the sins of our fathers.”

One example is Daniel 9, where the prophet pleads for mercy in sackcloth and ashes for the former sins of Israel, said PCA pastor Lane Keister. “On the flip side, you have Ezekiel 18, which makes it clear that each person is only condemned for his own sin.”

After nine hours of debate, the PCA’s Overtures Committee, which makes recommendations to the General Assembly, voted 80–0 to punt the resolution to next year.

Its reasons: to give time to perfect the language, to allow specific suggestions for repentance, and to give churches time to study the PCA’s complicity, in order to produce a more “heartfelt and accurate” repentance.

But when the recommendation hit the assembly floor that night, many were surprised. “There was a sense of, ‘Why would you want to drag your feet on repenting?’ ” said Duncan.

“If the desire is to present a perfect resolution, we’ll never have one,” said PCA pastor Leon Brown. Delaying repentance “does not work in our churches, in our marriages, and in other relationships.”

But corporate repentance takes more time than individual repentance, Keister said. “You can’t get an entire denomination to fully repent on a dime.”

Click here to read more.

SOURCE: Christianity Today
Sarah Eekhoff Zylstra

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s