Michael Seewald, Father-in-Law of Josh Duggar’s Sister, Jessa Duggar, Defends him in Blog Post

© Kris Connor/Getty Images Anna Duggar and Josh Duggar pose during the 42nd annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at the Gaylord National Resort Hotel and Convention Center on February 28, 2015 in National Harbor…
© Kris Connor/Getty Images Anna Duggar and Josh Duggar pose during the 42nd annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at the Gaylord National Resort Hotel and Convention Center on February 28, 2015 in National Harbor…

Ben Seewald’s father Michael posted an essay on his blog Monday, defending Josh Duggar, who last week admitted to sexually assaulting children, including his sisters, when he was a teen. 

In a post titled “Grace Greater Than Our Sin,” Michael, who is the father-in-law of Josh’s sister Jessa Duggar, says while people shouldn’t “downplay the seriousness” of the molestation offenses, he is “rooting” for the “19 Kids And Counting” star. “I want to say to Josh, hang in there, the shame you feel is legitimate, yet Jesus took your shame as he was punished in your place,” he writes . “Rest in his forgiveness and grace. Remember that he gives you his righteousness as a covering for your shame.”

Michael reveals he was initially hesitant to make a public statement because “it pains me to see that they are now having to relive the nightmare that had been laid to rest well over a decade ago with Josh’s repentance and reformation,” but he decided to break his silence “to bring some context and reason to the bloodletting that many are engaging in and to come to the aid of our dear friends and family.”

Ben’s dad refrains from discussing the legal aspect of Duggar’s abusive actions, but “commends” his parents Jim Bob and Michelle for their handling of the situation. He writes:

“As it stands criminal charges were not brought against Josh but I believe that Josh’s parents acted in a way that godly parents should. They did not turn a blind eye, but earnestly sought help from the church, counselors, and eventually the police. Maybe they didn’t do it in a way that pleases everyone, but they acted decisively to confront the sin, to call a penitent son back from his errors, and to seek to aid the hurting victims. In the end Josh sought forgiveness from those he wronged, repented of his sins, and came to trust Christ as his Savior.”

Michael goes on to argue, “Some people act as if it was the Duggars’ responsibility to have made this sad episode in their family public knowledge. They are to be praised for not hiding this from the appropriate parties and eventually the police, but they owed it to no one else to publicize the sins of a minor child and the court agrees with that assessment, the judge now ordering that the police report be destroyed.”

He also addresses comments from critics who say Duggar committed his offenses because he was sexually repressed. Michael responds:

“They think that had he [had] access to sex education by Planned Parenthood, been allowed to watch edgy Hollywood films, been encouraged to experimentation with a girlfriend, or gotten free condoms from the local school nurse, then none of this would have happened. Right. The stupidity of some people is mind boggling. Fan the flames of youthful lust and you end up with what we have: unprecedented numbers of unwed mothers, millions of abortions, rampant STDs, and the unraveling of the fabric of our whole society. Josh didn’t sin because he was repressed, he sinned because like all of us he is a sinner.”

Michael further writes, “Here is a warning for everyone reading this, by condemning a repentant sinner you have placed yourself in the place of God.” But he also expresses concern for the violated parties, saying they “should not be lost in all of this,” and encourages victims of sexual abuse to speak up. “It is not your fault. No matter what the abuser may have said, you are not the one to blame,” writes Michael. “Do not keep silent if you are being abused, tell someone you trust, a parent, a teacher, a friend, anyone is better than silence.”

Click here to read more

Source: Gossip Cop |  James Crugnale

One comment

  1. After 2 days of use, I have found an utterly unacceptable software bug in this model.With 4 or less of battery capacity remaining, the phone will refuse to boot, even it is plugged in using the provided Asus charger. Give it a try; run you battery down to 5 and turn off your phone. When you go to turn it back on, it will still start up fine (as long as it still has at least 5). For the next test, let the battery run down to 4 or lower and then power down. You will not be able to load the operating system when trying to re-power up.I consider this to be a serious software problem. Keep in mind that this isn’t an issue of the stock charger not being able to provide sufficicient power to boot a phone on a completely empty battery, as surely, a simple system bootup does not use 5 of your battery. I am convinced that Asus has programmed a 5 minimum battery remaining percentage, the phone automatically shutting down if you try to boot with less than that number.Strangely, Asus’ software will let you continue using your phone right down until 0 of your battery is left, if it is already turned on. They just won’t let you get back into your phone after a power down if the battery is low.So how is this significant? If you have completely drained your battery, users expect to immediately be able to use the phone again after plugging the charger in. Not with this phone! You won’t be able to use your phone for 10 minutes, the time it takes the 2GB ram model stock charger to get the battery back up to 5.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s