UVA Dean Files Lawsuit Against Rolling Stone Over Discredited Campus Rape Article

uva-sues-rolling-stone-rape

A University of Virginia dean is seeking more than $7.5 million in damages from Rolling Stone, accusing the magazine and journalist behind a now-discredited article about a brutal sexual assault on campus of depicting the school administrator as the “chief villain” embodying the university’s alleged indifference toward rape.

Nicole Eramo, associate dean of students at UVA, filed a defamation lawsuit Tuesday against the magazine, writer Sabrina Rubin Erdely, and Wenner Media, which published the explosive article that detailed a graphic gang-rape on campus and a callous response from university officials. The credibility of the story, however, swiftly unraveled after other news organizations unearthed inconsistencies with the original article, and an independent investigation conducted by the Columbia School of Journalism ruled the story a “journalistic failure that was avoidable.”

“The Rolling Stone article has caused so much damage and reputational harm, both to me and also to so many others,” Eramo said in a statement through her attorney Tuesday. “I am filing this defamation lawsuit to set the record straight — and to hold the magazine and the author of the article accountable for their actions in a way they have refused to do themselves.”

In the lawsuit, Eramo blasts Rolling Stone for publishing inaccurate accounts and false statements to support the story of a student called Jackie, who alleged she was gang raped in a fraternity in 2012 and that university officials mishandled the investigation into her case. Eramo goes on to argue that contrary to the article’s description of her actions, as the university’s top administrator handling assault allegations she “immediately offered to assist Jack in holding her attackers accountable.”

“Rolling Stone and Erdely’s highly defamatory and false statements about Dean Eramo were not the result of an innocent mistake; they were the result of a wanton journalist who was more concerned with writing an article that fulfilled her preconceived narrative about the victimization of women on American college campuses, and a malicious publisher who was more concerned about selling magazines to boost the economic bottom line for its faltering magazine, than they were about discovering the truth or actual facts,” the lawsuit says.

Click here to read more.

SOURCE: MSNBC, Amanda Sakuma

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s