Case Against Florist Barronelle Stutzman, Who Wouldn’t Provide Flowers for Homosexual Wedding Based on Religious Reasons, Is Moving Forward

​The case against Barronelle Stutzman, the Richland florist who wouldn't provide flowers for a gay wedding based on religious reasons, is moving forward. Alliance Defending Freedom photo
​The case against Barronelle Stutzman, the Richland florist who wouldn’t provide flowers for a gay wedding based on religious reasons, is moving forward.
Alliance Defending Freedom photo

The case against Barronelle Stutzman, the Richland florist who wouldn’t provide flowers for a gay wedding based on religious reasons, is moving forward.

The Washington state Attorney General’s office is suing Stutzman and her business, Arlene’s Flowers, demanding she comply with Washington law, which prohibits businesses from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation.

Last week, Benton County Superior Court Judge Alex Ekstrom began hearing arguments on the case, including whether Stutzman can be found individually liable under the Consumer Protection Act, and whether the Attorney General’s Office has authority under the Consumer Protection Act to bring the case.

Click here for more.

SOURCE: BizJournals
Ben Miller

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s