Contrary to What Danny Cortez Said, the Southern Baptist Convention Is Not ‘Third Way’ on Divorce

Russell D. Moore
Russell D. Moore

It is not inconsistent for a church to accept divorced and remarried members with “mercy and grace” but require homosexuals to leave their gay lifestyle before joining the congregation, Southern Baptists’ lead ethicist said in response to arguments posed by the pastor of a church that was disfellowshipped from the Southern Baptist Convention because of its stance on homosexuality.

Charging Southern Baptists with hypocrisy is valid in some respects because “the divorce culture” in churches is an indication that Baptists have embraced “elements of the sexual revolution,” Moore, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, wrote in a blog post. “But divorce and remarriage is not, beyond that, applicable to the same-sex marriage debate.”

Moore’s post answered arguments made in an Oct. 21 Huffington Post article by Danny Cortez, pastor of New Heart Community Church in La Mirada, Calif. Acting on behalf of the SBC, its Executive Committee voted Sept. 23 to withdraw fellowship from New Heart, where some members including Cortez believe “same-sex marriage can be blessed by God.”

Cortez has called New Heart a “third way” church in which members can hold varying perspectives regarding same-sex marriage.

In his article, Cortez recounted attending EC meetings and telling the group’s Administrative Committee the SBC already practices the “third way” regarding divorce and remarriage because people with varying views are given “space to disagree” within the same church. Additionally, pastors who perform weddings for people who have been divorced for unbiblical reasons violate the Baptist Faith and Message’s prohibition of sanctioning adultery, but their churches are not disfellowshipped from the SBC, Cortez wrote, recounting his statements to the Administrative Committee.

Moore was present at the Sept. 23 Administrative Committee meeting and published his blog article the next day. He did not reference Cortez by name or attribute statements to him because EC policy prohibits reporting direct statements from committee and workgroup meetings. But he addressed Cortez’s arguments.

First, most evangelicals believe the Bible permits divorce in cases of adultery or abandonment by one spouse, Moore wrote, noting that remarriage after a permitted divorce is not sin. But even when Christians divorce for illegitimate reasons and then remarry, repentance does not require them to end their new marriages, he wrote.

“Suppose [an illegitimately divorced and remarried] couple repents of their sin and asks to be received, or welcomed back, into the church. What does repentance look like for them?” Moore wrote. “They have, in this scenario, committed an adulterous act (Matt. 5:32-33). Do they repent of this adultery by doing the same sinful action again, abandoning and divorcing one another? No. In most cases, the church recognizes that they should acknowledge their past sin and resolve to be faithful from now on to one another. Why is this the case? It’s because their marriages may have been sinfully entered into, but they are, in fact, marriages.”

Click here for more.

SOURCE: Baptist Press
David Roach

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s