Black Preaching: Thabiti Anyabwile Gives the Elements of Styles

Black Preaching

Over the past couple months, I’ve had the privilege to talk with a couple of seminarians concentrating on preaching. In both cases, they’ve wanted to talk about the distinctives of African-American preaching and what it contributes to our understanding of effective proclamation.

Those conversations have forced me to dig around in some books I’d forgotten I’d read as well as some new volumes. I’ve been reminded that there’s a fairly healthy academic debate about how best to understand Black preaching. Should we think of it primarily in terms of various elements and techniques, or should we think of its functions, whether prophetic, priestly, etc?

As I rummaged through these things, I began to think again about what some would call the elements of Black preaching. There are techniques and approaches that typify the form. Not all of these need be present, and no one element should be thought of as essential or indispensable. In other words, so-called “black preaching” comes in many styles and variations.

Moreover, the various techniques and approaches could be very edifying when used well or just as problematic when executed poorly. Here are a few musings–pros and cons–for whatever they’re worth.

Reading the text—In many respects, the “Black sermon” begins with the oftentimes slow, dramatic, exegetical reading of the text. I’ve been young and now I’m old-ish, but I’ve never seen a black preacher rush the reading of his text. He can take ten minutes to read ! Well, it seemed that way to me as a child. But the traditional preacher reads so that his main thought receives the emphasis. By intonation, repetition, and pace, the preacher helps the reader to know what to listen for. That’s a great aid to the listener when done well. But when a text is read poorly, the danger is misreading the text by emphasizing a phrase or point that’s not the point of the passage. When that happens, you know you’re not going to get exposition but something sub-biblical.

Announcing the subject—Often a preacher announces the subject or thought for the sermon following the reading. This is the thesis or main point driving the sermon. A skilled preacher can often give the point in a witty one-liner that sometimes elicits “Amens” and encouragement from the congregation. The art is to be memorable but not too clever, engaging but not merely entertaining, and to make sure the subject or main point can easily be seen in the text itself. When you’re laughing or “amen”-ing but can’t locate the preacher’s thought or subject in the text, that’s another tip-off that you’re not likely to get an exposition but a flight of fancy.

Dramatic Pause—Some people seem to go to church to leave church. Black preachers aren’t usually among them. Black preachers seem never to be in a hurry. They’ve mastered the art of pausing for effect. An artistic pause builds drama, changes direction, highlights surprises in the text, and calls the congregation to attention without saying a word. Some guys say in an insistent hiss, “Listen. Listen.” But some guys simply stand back, scanning the audience for an interminable moment, allowing the congregation to enter a feeling or thought. The white space provided by that well-timed pause is like lighting the fuse to a keg of anticipatory dynamite. That can be a great thing. But don’t be drama-cidal. Many a biblical text has been murdered with a lot of drama, peacocking, and much ado about nothing. Don’t over-use the pause. Don’t turn it into a show, a pantomime of wasted gesticulation. Some sermons could have been cut in half if the preacher had just preached rather than hem and haw so much.

Use of Story—Ours is an oral, story-telling culture. That’s behind the success of a lot of rap—it’s just rhythmic story-telling. It’s behind the success of black fiction—even the tawdry stuff that passes for literature in popular bookstores. And it’s no less true of black preaching. Telling the story makes all the difference. In the narrative portions of scripture, it requires sensing and developing the drama that’s already there. In the didactic portions, it may require using a good illustration or anecdote to elucidate the point of doctrine. And it’s always a good idea to illustrate the Bible with illustrations from the Bible. I can hear my college literature professor, Karla Holloway, saying to me, “Thabiti, show; don’t tell.” So rather than simply saying, “Men, flee from sexual immorality,” illustrate the point with the story of Joseph fleeing Potiphar’s wife, or David failing to flee from Bathsheba, or the vivid storied imagery of Proverbs.

But beware the sermon that’s all stories all the time. Beware the temptation to fill the sermon with anecdotes and tales that really have nothing to do with the point of the text. If you find a good illustration, anecdote, or story that doesn’t fit the text, write it down, keep it for later, and use it only when appropriate to the text. Sometimes stories get in the way of the Bible. We never want that to happen.

Click here to read more.

SOURCE: The Front Porch
Thabiti Anyabwile

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s